Skip to content

Severity indexHumanitarian Emergency and Security Crisis in Somalia

View the profile

Conflict severity index

CSI · IAW

Humanitarian Emergency and Security Crisis in Somalia

66.0/ 100
HighRanked 10 of 18 assessed conflicts

−2.5 · eased against the previous assessment (October 2026).

Assessed on 12 November 2026IAW
Assessment date
12 November 2026
Methodology
Version 1.0

Composition

What drives the score

The index adds up five dimensions of 20 points. The heaviest one in this assessment is shown open; each expands to show its four sub-indicators and the criterion applied.

  • External Military Support5.0 / 6Rubric criterion: Tropas extranjeras combatiendo; operaciones conjuntas.
  • Sanctions3.0 / 4Rubric criterion: Sectoriales amplias (energía, finanzas, armas).
  • International Presence4.5 / 5Rubric criterion: Peacekeeping (Cascos Azules); múltiples agencias ONU.
  • Media Coverage2.0 / 5Rubric criterion: Intermitente; picos tras incidentes.

Total: 66.0 out of 100. One circle equals one point.

Rationale

Assessment note

Serie retrospectiva mayo–noviembre de 2026, noviembre (al día 12) de 2026. Sin cambios relevantes respecto del mes anterior. Fuentes: Ficha IAW (nov. 2026); AFP 27 oct. y AP 28 oct. 2026; Middle East Forum.

Trend

How it changed month by month

Each point is a dated assessment. Horizontal lines mark the step from one band to the next.

70MayJunJulAugSeptOctNov66.0

Simulation

What would happen if a dimension changed

This simulator allows you to explore hypothetical scenarios. Adjust each dimension to see how the CSI would change.

CSI simulator

What if...?

13.5

Original: 13.5

13.0

Original: 13.0

12.0

Original: 12.0

13.0

Original: 13.0

14.5

Original: 14.5

Simulated Score

66.0

High

Actual

66.0

Adjust the controls to explore scenarios

Breakdown

M

13.5

C

13.0

E

12.0

H

13.0

I

14.5

The CSI is documented with verifiable sources and public criteria. The full methodology describes dimensions, sub-indicators, and how scores are assigned.

Full methodology