Back to Data
IAW Analysis

Armed Insurgency and Terrorist Violence in Nigeria

This conflict profile is being developed by IAW analysts

Last update: Feb 9, 2026

Scroll to explore

Conflict overview

Insurgent and terrorist activity causing mass displacement and sustained pressure on the state.

What you'll find on this page

Conflict Severity Index

IAW methodology — 5 dimensions, 20 sub-indicators

Rising
0
/100
High

The CSI (Conflict Severity Index) evaluates conflict severity on a 0-100 scale, combining 5 weighted dimensions (0-20 each): military intensity, civilian impact, escalation risk, humanitarian access, and internationalization.

Timeline — Key phases

The conflict as process. Each event: context, actors and consequences.

1YYYY-YYYY

Phase Title - Pending Development

This section will be populated with historical phases

Context

Placeholder text for timeline context

Consequences

Consequences to be documented

The origin of the conflict

The Sudanese civil war did not begin in April 2023, although that is when the world took notice. Its roots lie in the failed transition that followed the fall of Omar al-Bashir in April 2019, after three decades of dictatorship and mass protests that united civilians and the military against the regime.

What followed was a democratization experiment doomed from the start. The Transitional Sovereign Council, composed of civilians and the military, never resolved the fundamental contradiction: who would control the guns during the democratization process? While civilians from the FFC (Forces for Freedom and Change) tried to build institutions, the generals consolidated economic and military power.

The tension between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), led by Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary militia commanded by Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo "Hemedti", became the axis of the crisis. The RSF, born from Darfur militias and used by Bashir to crush rebellions, had transformed into a parallel army with its own funding (Darfur gold, UAE support) and tribal loyalties distinct from the state.

The tipping point came with the negotiation over integrating the RSF into the regular army. For Burhan, dissolving the RSF meant recovering the state monopoly on force. For Hemedti, integration meant losing autonomy and possibly facing war crimes trials in Darfur. The negotiation became a countdown to war.

On 15 April 2023, fighting erupted simultaneously in Khartoum, Darfur and other cities. What initially seemed a quick coup became a war of attrition. The SAF controls the formal state apparatus (airports, ministries), but the RSF dominates entire neighbourhoods of the capital and the gold trade.

The regionalization of the conflict complicates any solution. Egypt backs the SAF (institutionalism, state control), while the United Arab Emirates maintains financial ties with the RSF (commercial interests, counter-insurgency). The war has become a proxy for influence in the Horn of Africa and control of the Red Sea coast, vital for global trade.

Actors and power dynamics

Who holds power, who fights whom. Click to view the dossier.

Humanitarian impact

The humanitarian crisis is not a byproduct — it is a central feature of the conflict.

Internally Displaced
9M+
Cross-border Refugees
3M+
Food Insecure (IPC 3+)
25M
Estimated Deaths
150K+

International response

Resolutions, sanctions, peace processes and ongoing investigations.

UN Security Council Resolutions

Active sanctions

Peace processes & mediation

Investigations & accountability

Peacekeeping missions

Prospective scenarios

Projections for 6–12 months. Triggers, indicators and implications.

Probability:

Scenario 1 - Pending Development

Trigger 1 pending Trigger 2 pending

Probability:

Scenario 2 - Pending Development

Trigger 1 pending Trigger 2 pending

Probability:

Scenario 3 - Pending Development

Trigger 1 pending Trigger 2 pending

Monitoring indicators

conflictDetail.indicators.subtitle

Indicator 1 - Pending Development

conflictDetail.indicators.trend.stable

Key indicators will be identified as analysis develops

Placeholder indicator. Data collection in progress.

Indicator 2 - Pending Development

conflictDetail.indicators.trend.stable

Key indicators will be identified as analysis develops

Placeholder indicator. Data collection in progress.

Sources & methodology

Methodology pending: This profile is in initial development. As research is completed, full documentation of data sources, analysis methods, and information limitations will be provided.

This conflict profile is being developed by International Affairs Watch analysts. As research is completed, all data, scenarios, and indicators will be updated with verified information and in-depth analysis. Users are invited to return once the profile is fully developed.

International Affairs Watch

CSI
0
/100
High
Rising